Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Ultra vires
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about Ultra Vires totally explained

Ultra vires is a Latin phrase that literally means "beyond the power." Its inverse is called intra vires, meaning "within the power".
   It is used as a legal term in a number of common law contexts:

Corporate Law

In corporate law, ultra vires describes acts attempted by a corporation that are beyond the scope of powers granted by the corporation's Charter or in a clause in its Memorandum of Association; in the laws authorizing its formation, or similar founding documents. Acts attempted by a corporation that are beyond the scope of its charter are void or voidable. Even though dicta supporting the view that ultra vires acts were totally void appeared in many cases, most courts adopted the view that such acts were voidable rather than void. The doctrine continued to be grounded on the notion that a corporation possesses only limited power, but an elaborate body of principles developed defining when ultra vires might be asserted. Basic principles included the following:
  1. An ultra vires transaction might be ratified by all the shareholders.
  2. The doctrine of estoppel usually precluded reliance on the defense of ultra vires where the transaction was fully performed by one party
  3. A fortiori, a transaction which was fully performed by both parties couldn't be attacked.
  4. If the contract was fully executory, the defense of ultra vires might be raised by either party.
  5. If the contract was partially performed, and the performance was held to be insufficient to bring the doctrine of estoppel into play, a suit for quasi contract for recovery of benefits conferred was available.
  6. If an agent of the corporation committed a tort within the scope of his or her employment, the corporation couldn't defend on the ground the act was ultra vires. » Several modern developments relating to corporate formation have limited the probability that ultra vires acts will occur. Except in the case of non-profit corporations (including municipal corporations), this legal doctrine is obsolescent; within recent years, almost all business corporations are chartered to allow them to transact any lawful business. The Model Business Corporation Act of US says exactly in the following language The validity of corporate action may not be challenged on the ground that the corporation lacks or lacked power to act. The doctrine still has some life among non-profit corporations or state-created corporate bodies established for a specific public purpose, like universities or charities. In many jurisdictions, such as Australia, legislation provides that a corporation has all the powers of a natural person plus others; also, the validity of acts which are made ultra vires is preserved.


       However, certain other types of legal entity are not covered by such legislation. In the United Kingdom in Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Hazell [1992] 2 AC 1 the House of Lords held that interest rate swaps entered into by local authorities (a popular method of circumventing statutory restrictions on local authorities borrowing money at that time) were all ultra vires and void, sparking a raft of satellite litigation.
  • According to American laws, the concept of ultra vires can still arise in the following kinds of activities in some states:
  • Charitable or political contributions
  • Pensions, bonuses, stock option plans, job severance payments, and other fringe benefits
  • The power to enter into a partnership
  • The power to acquire shares of other corporations
  • Guaranty of indebtedness of another
  • Loans to officers or directors In the United Kingdom, the Companies Act 2006 (S.31 and S.39) greatly reduced the applicability of ultra vires in corporate law, although it can still apply in relation to charities and a shareholder may apply for an injunction, in advance only, to prevent an act which is claimed to be ultra vires.

    Constitutional Law

    Under constitutional law, particularly in Canada and the United States, constitutions give federal and provincial or state governments various powers. To go outside those powers would be ultra vires; for example, although the court didn't use the term, in striking down a federal law in United States v. Lopez on the grounds that it exceeded the Constitutional authority of Congress, the Supreme Court effectively declared the law to be ultra vires.
  • In British constitutional law, ultra vires describes patents, ordinances and the like enacted under the prerogative powers of the Crown that contradict statutes enacted by the King-in-Parliament. Almost unheard of in modern times, ultra vires acts by the Crown or its servants were previously a major threat to the rule of law. House of Lords - Boddington v. British Transport Police is an example of an appeal heard by House of Lords which contested that a byelaw was ultra-vires the powers conferred to it under section 67 of the Transport Act 1962.

    Administrative Law

    In administrative law, an act may be judicially reviewable ultra vires in a narrow or broad sense. Narrow ultra vires applies if an administrator didn't have the substantive power to make a decision or it was wrought with procedural defects. Broad ultra vires applies if there's an abuse of power (for example, Wednesbury unreasonableness or bad faith) or a failure to exercise an administrative discretion (for example, acting at the behest of another or unlawfully applying a government policy). Either doctrine may entitle a claimant to various prerogative writs, equitable remedies or statutory orders if they're satisfied.
       In the seminal case of Anisminic Ltd. v. Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 WLR 163, Lord Reid is accredited with formulating the doctrine of ultra vires. Further cases such as Bromley LBC v. Greater London Council [1983] AC 768 (see Lord Wilberforce's judgment) and Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (see Lord Diplock's judgment) have sought to refine the doctrine.

    Further Information

    Get more info on 'Ultra Vires'.


    External Link Exchanges

    Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

      <a href="http://ultra_vires.totallyexplained.com">Ultra vires Totally Explained</a>

    Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
       As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



  • Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
    This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Ultra vires (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version